Friday, October 31, 2014

Virginia Lawyers Immigration Board Of Appeals Inspection

If you are facing immigration case in Virginia, contact our law firm for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Jeremy v. United States

Facts:

Petitioner alien was held to be ineligible under 8 C.F.R. § 245.1(c)(8) to apply for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident pursuant to 8 U.S.C.S. § 1255(a) because he had been placed in removal proceedings. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) concurred with an immigration judge (IJ) that the alien was ineligible for adjustment of status because he was an arriving alien. The alien timely appealed the BIA's decision.

If you are facing a Immigration case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • "Admission" and "admitted" include only the lawful entry of an alien into the United States after inspection and authorization by an immigration officer. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1101(a)(13)(A). The main impact of this change for the former law is to re-characterize aliens who are present in the United States, but who have not been inspected and admitted. They are now considered "applicants for admission" along with other arriving aliens. The statute requires that all aliens who are seeking admission or readmission to the United States be inspected by immigration officers, prior to a determination of their status. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1225(a)(3).
  • "Admitted aliens" means individuals who have presented themselves for inspection by an immigration officer and who have been allowed to enter the country. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1101(a)(13)(A). "Paroled aliens" are otherwise inadmissible aliens who are given permission by the Attorney General to enter temporarily. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1182(d)(5)(A).

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Virginia Lawyers Immigration Board Of Appeal Deportation Proceedings Asylum

If you are facing immigration case in Virginia, contact our law firm for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Davis v. United States

Facts:

Petitioner alien challenged an order of respondent, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, which denied petitioner's request for asylum in the context of a motion to reopen the deportation proceedings under the Refugee Act of 1980, 8 U.S.C.S. § 1158. Petitioner based his motion on his fear of persecution for refusing to serve in the Salvadoran military.

If you are facing a Immigration case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • The Refugee Act of 1980 (the Act), 8 U.S.C.S. § 1158(a), which amended the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (INA), establishes for the first time a statutory basis for the grant of asylum to refugees already within the United States. Section 208(a) of the Act, 8 U.S.C.S. § 1158(a), provides the Attorney General and his delegates with discretion to grant asylum to an alien present in the United States, if the alien satisfies the statutory definition of refugee.
  •  The court must affirm the Immigration and Naturalization Board of Appeals (BIA)'s denial of a motion to reopen unless it (1) was made without a rational explanation, (2) inexplicably departed from established policies, or (3) rested on an impermissible basis such as invidious discrimination against a particular race or group. The BIA's decision need only be reasoned, not convincing.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Virginia Attorneys Immigration Board Appeals Naturalization Service Deportation

If you are facing immigration case in Virginia, contact our law firm for help.


We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

MacAulay v. United States

Facts:

Petitioner refugee sought review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (board), which entered an order in favor of respondent United States Immigration & Naturalization Service (INS) denying the refugee's application for asylum and withholding of deportation.

If you are facing a Immigration case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • The standard for withholding of deportation is more stringent than that for granting asylum. To qualify for withholding of deportation, an applicant must demonstrate a clear probability of persecution.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Monday, October 27, 2014

Virginia Lawyers Immigration Board Of Appeals Asylum

If you are facing immigration case in Virginia, contact our law firm for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Williams v. United States

Facts:

Petitioner filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 8 U.S.C.S. § 1105a(b), seeking judicial review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming a final order of exclusion by an Immigration Judge.

If you are facing a Immigration case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • In order to exercise the privilege of leaving temporarily, an alien must have a United States residence on return. If an alien chooses not to have a permanent residence in the United States , she cannot leave temporarily and reenter as a special immigrant under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1181(b) and 8 C.F.R. § 211.1(b)(1)(A). Residence is defined at § 101(a)(33) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as a person's principal place of abode, her actual dwelling place in fact, without regard to intent. Permanent is defined at § 101(a)(31) of the INA, 8 U.S.C.S. § 1101(a)(31), as a relationship of continuing or lasting nature, as distinguished from temporary.
  • The Immigration Court has no jurisdiction to grant a motion to change venue where an alien is being detained in Immigration and Naturalization Service custody.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Virginia Lawyers Immigration Board Of Appeals Deportation Asylum

If you are facing immigration case in Virginia, contact our law firm for help.


We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Hugo v. United States

Facts:

Petitioner alien sought review of an order issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals which affirmed an immigration judge's decision denying the alien's application for asylum, withholding of deportation, and relief under the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

If you are facing a Immigration case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • In the context of immigration proceedings, to the extent a petitioner objects to the fact that the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed an immigration judge's decision without opinion, such motions were barred by regulation. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(3).
  • In the context of immigration law, obtaining asylum is actually a two-step process. If an alien successfully demonstrates that he or she is eligible for asylum, then the United States Attorney General has the discretion to decide whether or not to grant asylum. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1158(b)(1).

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Friday, October 24, 2014

Virginia Lawyers Immigration Board Of Appeals Deportation Asylum

If you are facing immigration case in Virginia, contact our law firm for help.


We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Georgina v. United States

Facts:

Petitioner, an immigrant from Cambodia, sought review of two final orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals, the first denying petitioner's application for asylum and withholding and for discretionary waiver, the second denying her motions to reopen.

If you are facing a Immigration case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • Section 440(a) of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, 8 U.S.C.S. § 1105(a), ousts the jurisdiction of the federal courts to review the deportation petitions of, among other classes of aliens, aliens deportable by reason of firearms offenses under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1251(a)(2)(C).
  • The Immigration and Nationality Act itself provides that, in deportation proceedings, written notice, referred to as an order to show cause, shall be given to the alien specifying, among other things, the charges against the alien and the statutory provisions alleged to be have been violated. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252b(a)(1)(D).  

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Thursday, October 23, 2014

Virginia Immigration Lawyers Deportation Proceedings Detention

If you are facing immigration case in Virginia, contact our law firm for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Dickens v. United States

Facts:

Petitioner appealed from the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria, which denied his habeas corpus petition seeking review of respondent immigration service's decision to continue his pre-deportation detention, and the appeals board's dismissal of his appeal from an immigration judge's denial of his motion to reopen deportation proceedings.

If you are facing a Immigration case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:


  •  8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(c) gives the United States Attorney General discretion to detain an alien for six months from the date of the alien's final deportation order. The language of § 1252(d) forbids detention past the six-month period; after that time the Attorney General may only impose certain restrictions on the alien's movements.


We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Email Us:

First Name:
Last Name:
Email @:
Phone #: --
Message:

Our Phone #


Virginia

Fairfax 703-278-0405
Prince William 703-278-0405
Loudoun 703-278-0405
Fredericksburg 703-278-0405
Richmond 804-201-9009
Virginia
beach
757-512-5002
Lynchburg 434-509-4004
Powered by Blogger.

Search

Loading...

Social Icons

Popular Posts

Followers