Tuesday, April 15, 2014
Virginia Lawyers Immigration Deportation Asylum
Virginia Lawyers Immigration Deportation
Asylum
If you are facing immigration
case in Virginia, contact our law firm for help.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
We will do our absolute best
to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our
law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Kim v. United States
Facts:
Petitioners sought review of orders of respondent
directing their deportation, and a determination that pursuant to 8 U.S.C.S. §§
1158 and 1253(h)(2)(B) they were statutorily ineligible to apply for withholding
of deportation or asylum.
If you are facing a Immigration case in Virginia, contact
a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You
can reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- When the court reviews
an agency's construction of a statute which it administers, it is
confronted with two questions. First, always, is the question whether
Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the
intent of Congress is clear, that is the end of the matter; for the court,
as well as the agency, must give effect to the unambiguously expressed
intent of Congress . If, however, the court determines Congress has not
directly addressed the precise question at issue, the court does not
simply impose its own construction on the statute, as would be necessary
in the absence of an administrative interpretation. Rather, if the statute
is silent or ambiguous with respect to the specific issue, the question
for the court is whether the agency's answer is based on a permissible
construction of the statute.
- If a statute is silent or ambiguous on a question, the court next turns to the interpretation of the agency administering the statute. The court upholds the interpretation if it is permissible even if it is not the interpretation the court would have given to the same statute.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
We will do our absolute best
to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our
law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Disclaimer:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Email Us:
Our Phone #
Virginia | |
Fairfax | 703-278-0405 |
Prince William | 703-278-0405 |
Loudoun | 703-278-0405 |
Fredericksburg | 703-278-0405 |
Richmond | 804-201-9009 |
Virginia beach | 757-512-5002 |
Lynchburg | 434-509-4004 |
Powered by Blogger.
Popular Posts
-
Virginia Lawyers Immigration Board Of Appeal Deportation Illegal Reentry If you are facing immigration case in Virginia, contact our la...
-
Virginia Lawyers Immigration Board Of Appeal Deportation If you are facing immigration case in Virginia, contact our law firm for help....
-
Virginia Lawyers Immigration Board Of Appeal Deportation Prior Conviction If you are facing immigration case in Virginia, contact our l...
-
If you are facing immigration case in Virginia, contact our law firm for help. We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince Wil...
-
Virginia Lawyers Immigration Board Of Appeal Deportation Status Adjustment If you are facing immigration case in Virginia, contact our ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment