US Immigration Lawyers

If you are facing immigration case in Virginia, contact our law firm for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Hugo v. United States

Facts:

Petitioner alien sought review of an order issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals which affirmed an immigration judge's decision denying the alien's application for asylum, withholding of deportation, and relief under the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

If you are facing a Immigration case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

• In the context of immigration proceedings, to the extent a petitioner objects to the fact that the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed an immigration judge's decision without opinion, such motions were barred by regulation. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(3).
• In the context of immigration law, obtaining asylum is actually a two-step process. If an alien successfully demonstrates that he or she is eligible for asylum, then the United States Attorney General has the discretion to decide whether or not to grant asylum. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1158(b)(1).

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.


These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.