Friday, August 15, 2014

Virginia Lawyers Immigration Board Of Appeals Deportation Asylum

Virginia Lawyers Immigration Board Of Appeals Deportation Asylum

If you are facing immigration case in Virginia, contact our law firm for help. 

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Butler v. United States

Facts:

            Petitioner alien appealed the denial of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia of his habeas corpus request brought against respondent officials of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Board of Immigration Appeals. The Board had decided to deny asylum and the withholding of deportation. The alien was a native and citizen of the People's Republic of China.

            If you are facing a Immigration case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • The court reviews de novo both the district court's denial of an alien's petition for a writ of habeas corpus and the conclusion of the Board of Immigration Appeals that the alien has failed to meet asylum eligibility. However, the Board's factual findings may not be reversed unless the evidence not only supports a contrary conclusion, but compels it. To obtain judicial reversal of the Board's determination of ineligibility for asylum the alien must show that the evidence he presented is so compelling that no reasonable factfinder can fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.
  • The court noted that the alien did not prove, nor did the record disclose, that the Chinese government selectively enforced its population control policy against him because of his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. The court said that the alien was required to prove that the actions were for a reason other than to enforce the population control policy.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

0 comments:

Email Us:

First Name:
Last Name:
Email @:
Phone #: --
Message:

Our Phone #


Virginia

Fairfax 703-278-0405
Prince William 703-278-0405
Loudoun 703-278-0405
Fredericksburg 703-278-0405
Richmond 804-201-9009
Virginia
beach
757-512-5002
Lynchburg 434-509-4004
Powered by Blogger.

Social Icons

Popular Posts

Followers